Independent Trustees

Interested TrusteeTrustees

¹ The address of each Trustee/Nominee is 100 Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110.

² Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, until the election and qualification of his or her resignation, retirement during the yearsuccessor, or until he or she reaches age 75, death,sooner dies, resigns, retires, or removal.is removed.

³ Mr. Akhoury and Dr. Joskow,Leibler, if re-elected to your fund’s Board, will each serve until his retirement on June 30, 2022.2024.

⁴ Mses.* Ms. Murphy is the founder, controlling member, and PillaiChief Executive Officer of Runa Digital Assets, LLC (“RDA”), the investment manager of Runa Digital Partners, LP (“RDP”), a private investment fund. Ms. Murphy also holds a controlling interest in RDP’s general partner and is a limited partner in RDP. A subsidiary of Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Franklin Templeton”), of which Putnam Management is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, and certain individuals employed by Franklin Templeton or its affiliates have been nominatedmade passive investments as limited partners in RDP (one of whom serves on the advisory board for electionRDA, which has no governance or oversight authority over RDA), representing in the aggregate approximately 33% of RDP as of October 31, 2023. In addition, if certain conditions are met, Franklin Templeton will be entitled to your fund’s Boardreceive a portion of any incentive compensation allocable to RDP’s general partner. For so long as Franklin Templeton maintains its investment in RDP, Ms. Murphy also has agreed upon request to advise and if elected, will serveconsult with Franklin Templeton and its affiliates on the market for digital assets. Ms. Murphy provides similar service to other limited partners in RDP that request her advice. Ms. Murphy also is entitled to receive deferred cash compensation in connection with her prior employment by an affiliate of Franklin Templeton, which employment ended at the end of 2021. With regard to Ms. Murphy, the relationships described above may give rise to a potential conflict of interest with respect to the funds.

** Trustee who is an "interested person" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, Putnam Premier Income Trust, and Putnam Management. Mr. Reynolds is deemed an "interested person" by virtue of his position as Trustees beginning Julyan officer of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, and Putnam Premier Income Trust and his direct beneficial interest in shares of Franklin Templeton, of which Putnam Management is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary. Mr. Reynolds is the President of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, Putnam Premier Income Trust, and each of the other Putnam funds, and prior to January 1, 2022.2024, Mr. Reynolds was President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Management and Putnam Investments, LLC, the previous parent company to Putnam Management.

*** Trustee who is an “interested person” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the fund and Putnam Management. Mr. ReynoldsMs. Trust is deemed an “interested person” by virtue of hisher positions as an officer of the fund and Putnam Management. Mr. Reynolds is the President and Chief Executive Officerwith certain affiliates of Putnam Investments, LLC and President of your fund and each of the other Putnam funds, exclusive of the four exchange-traded funds in Putnam ETF Trust.Management.

Most of the Trustees have served on the Board for many years. The Board Policy and Nominating Committee is responsible for recommending nominees for election to the Board of Trustees for its approval. As is described in more detail below, the Committee considers the skills and characteristics that it determines would most benefit the Putnam funds, and considers diversity of background, experience, and views. In recommending the election of the nominees as Trustees, the Committee generally considered these matters and the educational, business, and professional experience of each nominee in determining his

or her qualifications to serve as a Trustee of the fund, including the nominee’s record of service as a director or trustee of public and private organizations. This included each current Trustee’s previous service as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds, during which he or she has demonstrated a high level of diligence and commitment to the interests of fund shareholders and the ability to work effectively and

collegially with other members of the Board. The Committee also considered, among other factors, the particular attributes described below with respect to the various individual Trustees.

Independent Trustees:

Liaquat Ahamed — Mr. Ahamed’s experience as Chief Executive Officer of a major investment management organization and as head of the investment division at the World Bank, as well as his experience as an author of economic literature.

Ravi Akhoury — Mr. Akhoury’s experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a major investment management organization.

Barbara M. Baumann — Ms. Baumann’s experience in the energy industry as a consultant, an investor, and in both financial and operational management positions at a global energy company, and her service as a director of multiple New York Stock Exchange companies.

Katinka Domotorffy — Ms. Domotorffy’s experience as Chief Investment Officer and Global Head of Quantitative Investment Strategies at a major asset management organization.

Catharine Bond Hill — Dr. Hill’s education and experience as an economist and as president and provost of colleges in the United States.

Paul L. Joskow — Dr. Joskow’s education and experience as a professional economist familiar with financial economics and related issues and his service on multiple for-profit boards.

Kenneth R. Leibler — Mr. Leibler’s extensive experience in the financial services industry, including as Chief Executive Officer of a major asset management organization, and his service as a director of various public and private companies.

Jennifer Williams Murphy — Ms. Murphy’s experience as Chief Operating Officer of a major global investment management organization and as Chief Executive Officer of an investment advisory firm specializing in digital assets.

Marie Pillai — Ms. Pillai’s experience as Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer of a global food company, her experience in similar positions at a global engineering company, and her experience in corporate and operational finance roles at a global consumer products company.

George Putnam III — Mr. Putnam’s training and experience as an attorney, his experience as the founder and Chief Executive Officer of an investment management firm and his experience as an author of various publications on the subject of investments.

Manoj P. Singh — Mr. Singh’s experience as Chief Operating Officer and global managing director of a global professional services organization that provided accounting, consulting, tax, risk management, and financial advisory services.

Mona K. Sutphen — Ms. Sutphen’s extensive experience advising corporate, philanthropic and institutional investors on the intersection of geopolitics, policy and markets, as well as her prior service as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and as a US Foreign Service Officer, her work advising financial services companies on macro risks, and her service as a director of public companies.

Interested Trustee:Trustees:

Robert L. Reynolds — Mr. Reynolds’s extensive experience as a senior executive of one of the largesta major mutual fund organizationsorganization in the United States and his currentprevious role as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Investments.Management and Putnam Investments, LLC, the previous parent company to Putnam Management.

Jane E. Trust — Ms. Trust’s investment management and risk oversight experience as an executive and portfolio manager and her leadership roles within Franklin Templeton and affiliated entities.

Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a Trustee, if elected. If any nominee is unavailable for election at the time of the annual meeting, which is not anticipated, the persons designated on the proxy card may vote for other nominees at their discretion or may fix the number of Trustees at fewer than 1112 for your fund.

What are the Trustees’ responsibilities?

Your fund’s Trustees are responsible for the general oversight of your fund’s affairs. The Trustees regularly review your fund’s investment performance as well as the quality of other services provided to your fund and its shareholders by Putnam Management and its affiliates, including administration and shareholder servicing. Currently, Putnam Management and its affiliates provide administrative services to your fund. At least annually, theThe Trustees review and evaluate the fees and operating expenses paid by your fund for these services, typically on an annual basis, and negotiate changes if they deem it appropriate. In carrying out these responsibilities, the Trustees are assisted by an independent administrative staff and by your fund’s auditors, independent counsel and other experts as appropriate, selected by and responsible to the Trustees.

Board Leadership Structure. Currently, all but onetwo of your fund’s Trustees are Independent Trustees, meaning that they are not considered “interested persons” of your fund or Putnam Management. Mses. Murphy and Pillai also qualify as Independent Trustees. These Independent Trustees must vote separately to approve all financial arrangements and other agreements with your fund’s investment manager and other affiliated parties. The role of the Independent Trustees has been characterized as that of a “watchdog” charged with oversight to protect shareholders’ interests against overreaching and abuse by those who are in a position to control or influence a fund. Your fund’s Independent Trustees meet regularly as a group in executive session (i.e., without representatives of Putnam Management or its affiliates present). An Independent Trustee currently serves as chair of the Board.

Board Committees. Taking into account the number, the diversity, and the complexity of the funds overseen by the Board and the aggregate amount of assets under management, your fund’s Trustees have determined that the efficient conduct of the Board’s affairs makes it desirable to delegate responsibility for certain specific matters to committees of the Board. The Executive Committee, Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee, and Board Policy and Nominating Committee are authorized to take action on certain matters as specified in their charters or in policies and procedures relating to the governance of the funds; with respect to other matters, these committees review and evaluate and make recommendations to the Trustees as they deem appropriate. The other committees also review and evaluate matters specified in their charters and make recommendations to the Trustees as they deem appropriate. Each committee may utilize the resources of your fund’s independent staff, independent counsel and independent registered public accountants as well as other experts. The committees meet as often as appropriate, either in conjunction with regular meetings of the Trustees or otherwise. The membership and chair of each committee are appointed by the Trustees upon recommendation of the Board Policy and Nominating Committee. Each committee is chaired by an

Independent Trustee and, except as noted below, the membership and chairs of each committee consist exclusively of Independent Trustees.

The Trustees have determined that this committee structure also allows the Board to focus more effectively on the oversight of risk as part of its broader oversight of the funds’ affairs. While risk management is the primary responsibility of the funds’ investment manager, the Trustees receive reports and presentations regarding investment risks, compliance risks and other risks. The Board and certain committees also meet periodically with the funds’ and Putnam Management’s Chief Compliance Officer to receive compliance reports and with Putnam Management’s Chief Risk Officer to receive reports regarding risk oversight.reports. In addition, the Board and its Investment Oversight Committees meet periodically with the portfolio managers of the funds to receive reports regarding the management of the funds. The Board’s committee structure allows separate committees to focus on different aspects of these risks and their potential impact on some or all of the funds and to discuss with the funds’ investment manager how it monitors and controls risks.

The Board recognizes that the reports it receives concerning risk management matters are, by their nature, typically summaries of the relevant information. Moreover, the Board recognizes that not all risks that may affect your fund can be identified in advance; that it may not be practical or cost-effective to eliminate or to mitigate certain risks; that it may be necessary to bear certain risks (such as investment-related risks) in seeking to achieve your fund’s investment objectives; and that the processes, procedures and controls employed to address certain risks may be limited in their effectiveness. As a result of the foregoing and for other reasons, the Board’s risk management oversight is subject to substantial limitations.

Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee. The Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee provides oversight on matters relating to the integrity of the Putnam funds’ financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, Codes of Ethics issues, and certain aspects of overseeing Putnam Management’s risk assessment and risk management. This oversight is discharged by regularly meeting with management, the funds’ independent registered public accountants, and the fund’sfunds’ and Putnam Management’s Chief Compliance Officer, and Putnam Management’s Chief Risk Officer, and remaining current with respect to industry developments. Duties of this Committee also include the review and evaluation of all matters and relationships pertaining to the funds’ independent registered public accountants, including their independence. The Committee also oversees all dividends and distributions by the funds. The Committee makesfunds by making recommendations to the Trustees of the funds regarding the amount and timing of distributions paid by the funds, and determinesdetermining such matters when the Trustees are not in session. The Committee also oversees the policies and procedures pursuant to which Putnam Management prepares recommendations for dividends and distributions, and meets regularly with representatives of Putnam Management to review the implementation of these policies and procedures. The Committee reports to the Trustees and makes recommendations to the Trustees regarding these matters. Information about the fees billed to the fund by the funds’ registered public accountant, as well as information about the Committee’s pre-approval policies relating to the work performed by the funds’ registered public accountant, is included beginning on page 3241 of this proxy statement. Each member of the Committee is an Independent Trustee. Each member of the Committee also is “independent,” as that term is interpreted for purposes of Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Committee, a current copy of which is available at www.putnam.com/about-putnam/ at the bottom of that page. The Committee currently consists of Messrs.Mr. Singh (Chair) and Akhoury, Ms. Domotorffy and Drs., Dr. Hill, and Joskow.Mses. Murphy, Pillai, and Sutphen. Mr. Singh, and Drs.Dr. Hill, and JoskowMs. Murphy have each been designated an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of applicable SEC rules.

Board Policy and Nominating Committee. The Board Policy and Nominating Committee reviews matters pertaining to the operations of the Board and its committees, the compensation of the Trustees, and the conduct of legal affairs for the Putnam funds. The Committee also oversees thePutnam Management’s voting of proxies associated with portfolio investments of the Putnam funds, with the goal of ensuring that these proxies are voted in the best interest of each fund’s shareholders. The Committee reports to the Trustees and makes recommendations to the Trustees regarding these matters.

The Committee evaluates and recommends all candidates for election as Trustees and recommends the appointment of members and chairs of each Board committee. The Committee also identifies prospective nominees for election as Trustee by considering individuals that come to its attention through the recommendation of current Trustees, Putnam Management or shareholders. Candidates properly submitted by shareholders will be considered and evaluated on the same basis as candidates recommended by other sources. The Committee will consider nominees for Trustee recommended by shareholders of a fund provided that the recommendations are submitted by the date disclosed in the fund’s proxy statement and otherwise comply with the fund’s by-laws and applicable securities laws, including Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. The Committee may, but is not required to, engage a third-party professional search firm to assist it in identifying and evaluating potential nominees.

When evaluating a potential candidate for membership on the Board, the Committee considers the skills and characteristics that it determines would most benefit the Putnam funds at the time the evaluation is made. The Committee may take into account a wide variety of attributes in considering potential Trustee candidates,

including, but not limited to: (i) availability and commitment of a candidate to attend meetings and perform his or her responsibilities to the Board, (ii) other board experience, (iii) relevant industry and related experience, (iv) educational background, (v) financial expertise, (vi) an assessment of the candidate’s ability, judgment and expertise, (vii) an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board and its committees at that point in time, and (viii) overall Board composition. The Committee generally believes that the Board benefits from diversity of background, experience, and views among its members, and considers this as a factor in evaluating the composition of the Board, but has not adopted any specific policy in this regard. In connection with this evaluation, the Committee will determine whether to interview prospective nominees, and, if warranted, one or more members of the Committee, and other Trustees and representatives of the funds, as appropriate, will interview prospective nominees in person or by telephone.nominees. Once this evaluation is completed, the Committee recommends such candidates as it determines appropriate to the Independent Trustees for nomination, and the Independent Trustees select the nominees after considering the recommendation of the Committee. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Committee, a current copy of which is available at www.putnam.com/about-putnam/ at the bottom of that page. The Committee is composed entirely of Independent Trustees and currently consists of Mses. Baumann (Chair) and Sutphen, Dr. Joskow (Chair),Hill, and Messrs. Leibler and Putnam, and Ms. Baumann.Putnam.

Brokerage Committee. The Brokerage Committee reviews the Putnam funds’ policies regarding the execution of portfolio trades and Putnam Management’s (and its affiliates’) practices and procedures relating to the implementation of those policies. The Committee reviews periodic reports on the cost and quality of execution of portfolio transactions and the extent to which brokerage commissions have been used (i) by Putnam Management (or its affiliates) to obtain brokerage and research services generally useful to it (or its affiliates) in managing the portfolios of the funds and of its other clients, and (ii) by the funds to pay for certain fund expenses. The Committee reports to the Trustees and makes recommendations to the Trustees regarding these matters. The Committee currently consists of Messrs. Ahamed (Chair), Leibler, and Putnam, and Mses. Baumann and Sutphen.Domotorffy.

Contract Committee. The Contract Committee reviews and evaluates at least annually all arrangements pertaining to (i) the engagement of Putnam Management and its affiliates to provide services to the Putnam funds, (ii) the expenditure of the open-end funds’ assets for distribution purposes pursuant to Distribution Plans of the open-end Putnam funds, and (iii) the engagement of

other persons to provide certain material services to the funds, including in particular those instances where the cost of services is shared between the funds and Putnam Management and its affiliates or where Putnam Management or its affiliates have a material interest. The Committee also reviews the proposed organization of new fund products, proposed structural changes to existing funds, andcertain matters relating to closed-end funds. In addition, the Committee also reviews communications with, and the quality of services provided to, shareholders and oversees the marketing and sale of fund shares by Putnam Retail Management. The Committee reports and makes recommendations to the Trustees regarding these matters. The Committee currently consists of Messrs. Putnam (Chair), Ahamed, and Leibler, and Mses. Baumann and Sutphen.Domotorffy.

Exchange-Traded Fund Committee. The Exchange-Traded Fund Committee is responsible for assisting the Trustees in their oversight of the Putnam funds that are exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”). The Committee reviews matters arising from time to time relating to the ETFs that are not otherwise within the general subject matter purview of another committee, including, but not limited to: (i) service provider relationships that are specific to the ETFs, (ii) business, industry, legal, and regulatory matters that are specific to the ETFs, (iii) proposals relating to new ETFs, and (iii) transactions involving ETFs. The Committee reports to the Trustees and makes recommendations to the Trustees regarding these matters. The current members are Messrs. Ahamed (Chair) and Leibler, Dr. Hill, and Mses. Domotorffy, Murphy, and Sutphen.

Executive Committee. The functions of the Executive Committee are twofold. The first is to ensure that the Putnam funds’ business may be conducted at times when it is not feasible to convene a meeting of the Trustees or for the Trustees to act by written consent. The Committee may exercise any or all of the power and authority of the Trustees when the Trustees are not in session. The second is to review annual and ongoing goals, objectives and priorities for the Board and to facilitate coordination of all efforts between the Trustees and Putnam Management on behalf of the shareholders of the funds. The Committee currently consists of Messrs. Leibler (Chair) and Putnam and Ms. Baumann.

Investment Oversight Committees. The Investment Oversight Committees regularly meet with investment personnel of Putnam Management and its affiliates to review the investment performance and strategies of the funds in light of their stated goals and policies. The Committees seek to identify any compliance issues that are unique to the applicable categories of funds and work with the appropriate Board committees to ensure that any such issues are properly addressed. The Committees review the proposed investment objectives, policies and restrictions of new fund products and proposed changes to investment objectives, policies and restrictions of existing funds. Investment Oversight Committee A currently consists of Mses. Domotorffy (Chair), Murphy and Sutphen, and Messrs. Ahamed, Reynolds, and Singh, and Dr. Joskow.Singh. Investment Oversight Committee B currently consists of Mses. Pillai (Chair) and Baumann, Dr. Hill, and Messrs. Akhoury (Chair), Leibler and Putnam, Ms. Baumann, and Dr. Hill.Putnam.

Pricing Committee. The Pricing Committee oversees the valuation of assets of the Putnam funds and reviews the funds’ policies and procedures for achieving accurate and timely pricing of fund shares. The Committee oversees implementation of these policies, including fair value determinations of individual securities made by Putnam Management or other designated agents of the funds. The Committee also reviews (i) compliance by money market funds with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, (ii) in-kind redemptions by fund affiliates, (iii) the correction of occasional pricing errors, and (iv) Putnam Management’s oversight of pricing vendors. The Committee reports to the Trustees and makes recommendations to the Trustees regarding these matters. The Committee currently consists of Messrs.Mr. Singh (Chair), Dr. Hill, and Akhoury, Ms. Domotorffy,Mses. Murphy, Pillai, and Dr. Hill.Sutphen.

How large of a stake do the Trustees have in the Putnam family of funds?

The Trustees allocate their investments among the Putnam funds based on their own investment needs. The table below shows the number of shares of each fund beneficially owned by each nominee for Trustee, as well as the value of each nominee’s holdings in each fund and in all of the Putnam funds as of December 31, 2021.2023. As a group, the Trustees owned shares ofin the Putnam funds valued at approximately $82$72 million, as of December 31, 2021.2023. Ms. Trust did not serve as Trustee during any fund’s most recently completed fiscal year or during the calendar year 2023 and is therefore not included in the tables below.

* Mr. Akhoury and Dr. Joskow, if re-elected, will each serve until his retirement on June 30, 2022.

^#

(1) Mses. Murphy and Pillai have been nominated for electionwere elected to your fund’s Boardthe Boards of Trustees of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, and if elected, will servePutnam Premier Income Trust effective as Trustees beginningof July 1, 2022.2022 (and each was elected to the Boards of Trustees of other Putnam funds as of July 1, 2022 or, for a limited number of Putnam funds, as of a later date).

(2) Trustee who is an "interested person" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, Putnam Premier Income Trust, and Putnam Management. Mr. Reynolds is deemed an "interested person" by virtue of his position as an officer of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, and Putnam Premier Income Trust and his direct beneficial interest in shares of Franklin Templeton, of which Putnam Management is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary. Mr. Reynolds is the President of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, Putnam Premier Income Trust, and each of the other Putnam funds, and prior to January 1, 2024, Mr. Reynolds was President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Management and Putnam Investments, LLC, the previous parent company to Putnam Management.

As of December 31, 2021,February 29, 2024, none of the Trustees owned any preferred shares of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust or Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust. As of December 31, 2021,February 29, 2024, each Trustee, and the officers and Trustees of the fund as a group, owned less than 1% of each fund’s outstanding common shares.

How can shareholders communicate with the Trustees?

The Board provides a process for shareholders to send communications to the Trustees. Shareholders may direct communications to the Board as a whole or to specified individual Trustees by submitting them in writing to the following address:

Written communications must include the shareholder’s name, be signed by the shareholder, refer to the Putnam fund(s) in which the shareholder holds shares, and include the class and number of shares held by the shareholder as of a recent date.

Representatives of the funds’ transfer agent will review all communications sent to Trustees and, as deemed appropriate, will provide copies and/or summaries of communications to the Trustees.

How often do the Trustees meet?

The Trustees currently hold regular in-person meetings eight times each year, usually over a two-day period, to review the operations of the Putnam funds. (During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trustees have held meetings by videoconference or teleconference rather than in person.) A portion of these meetings is devoted to meetings of various committees of the Board that focus on particular matters. Each Independent Trustee generally attends several formal committee meetings during each regular meeting of the Trustees, including meetings with senior investment personnel and portfolio managers to review recent performance and the current investment climate for selected funds. These meetings ensure that fund performance is reviewed in detail on at least an annual basis. The committees of the Board, including the Executive Committee, may also meet on special occasions as the need arises. During the calendar year 2021,2023, each Trustee attended at least 75% of the Board and applicable committee meetings noted for each fund and the average Trustee participated in approximately 3836 Board and committee meetings.¹

¹ Ms. Trust was appointed to the Boards of Trustees of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, Putnam Premier Income Trust and each of the other Putnam funds effective January 26, 2024. Ms. Trust therefore did not attend Board or committee meetings during the calendar year 2023.

The number of times the full Board and each committee met during calendar year 20212023 is shown in the table below:

The funds do not have a formal policy with respect to Trustee attendance at shareholder meetings. While various Trustees may attend shareholder meetings from time to time, your fund’s Trustees did not attend the last annual meeting of your fund. The Trustees are generally represented at shareholder meetings by their independent staff and independent counsel.

What are some of the ways in which the Trustees represent shareholder interests?

Among other ways, the Trustees seek to represent shareholder interests:

• by reviewing your fund’s investment performance with your fund’s investment personnel;

• by discussing with senior management of Putnam Management steps being taken to address any performance deficiencies;

• by reviewing the quality of the various other services provided to your fund and its shareholders by Putnam Management and its affiliates;

• by reviewing in depth the fees paid by each fund and by negotiating with Putnam Management, if appropriate, to ensure that the fees remain reasonable and competitive with those of comparable funds, while at the same time providing Putnam Management sufficient resources to continue to provide high quality services in the future;

• by reviewing brokerage costs and fees, allocations among brokers, and soft dollar expenditures (if applicable);

• by discussing shareholder outreach initiatives with senior management of Putnam Management;

• by reviewing the specific concerns of closed-end fund shareholders;

• by monitoring potential conflicts of interest between the Putnam funds, including your fund, and Putnam Management and its affiliates to ensure that the funds continue to be managed in the best interests of their shareholders; and

• by monitoring potential conflicts among funds managed by Putnam Management to ensure that shareholders continue to realize the benefits of participation in a large and diverse family of funds.

What are the Trustees paid for their services?

Each Independent Trustee of the funds receives an annual retainer fee and additional fees for each Trustee meeting attended and for certain related services. Independent Trustees also are reimbursed for expenses they incur relating to their service as Trustees. All of the current Independent Trustees of the funds are Trustees of all of the Putnam funds.

The Trustees periodically review their fees to ensure that the fees continue to be appropriate in light of their responsibilities as well as in relation to fees paid to trustees of other mutual fund complexes. The Board Policy and Nominating Committee, which consists solely of Independent Trustees, of the funds, estimates that committee and Trustee meeting time, together with the appropriate preparation, requires the equivalent of at least four business days per regular Trustee meeting.

Under a Retirement Planretirement plan in effect for Trustees of the Putnam funds elected to the Board before 2003 (the “Plan”), each eligible Trustee who retires with at least five years of service as a Trustee of the funds is entitled to receive an annual retirement benefit equal to one-half of the average annual

attendance and retainer fees paid to such Trustee for calendar years 2003, 2004 and 2005. This retirement benefit is payable during a Trustee’s lifetime, beginning the year following retirement, for the number of years of service through December 31, 2006. A death benefit, also available under the Plan, ensures that the Trustee and his or her beneficiaries will receive benefit payments for the lesser of an aggregate period of (i) ten years or (ii) such Trustee’s total years of service.

The Plan Administrator (currently the Board Policy and Nominating Committee) may terminate or amend the Plan at any time, but no termination or amendment will result in a reduction in the amount of benefits (i) currently being paid to a Trustee at the time of such termination or amendment, or (ii) to which a current Trustee would have been entitled had he or she retired immediately prior to such termination or amendment. The Trustees have terminated the Plan with respect to any Trustee first elected to the Board after 2003.

The following table includestables include the year each Trustee became a Trustee of the Putnam funds, the fees paid to each of those Trustees by each fund included in this proxy statement for its most recent fiscal year (ended prior to December 31, 2021)2023), and the fees paid to each of those Trustees by all of the Putnam funds during calendar year 2021. Mses. Murphy and Pillai2023. Ms. Trust did not serve as TrusteesTrustee of the Board during any fund’s recently completed fiscal year or during the calendar year 20212023 and areis therefore not included in the tabletables below.

(1) Estimated benefits for each Trustee are based on Trustee fee rates for calendar years 2003, 2004 and 2005.

(2) As of December 31, 2021,2023, there were 10089 mutual funds, 4 closed-end funds, and 12 exchange-traded funds in the Putnam family.

funds complex.

(3)(2) Certain Trustees are also owed compensation deferred pursuant to a Trustee Compensation Deferral Plan. As of each fund’s fiscal year ended prior to December 31, 2021,2023, no amounts of deferred compensation were payable, including income earned on such amounts, to these Trustees by these funds.Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, or Putnam Premier Income Trust.

(3) Includes additional compensation to Ms. Baumann for service as Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees.

(4) Mr. Akhoury and Dr. Joskow, if re-elected, will each retire on June 30, 2022.

(5) Includes additional compensation to Mr. Leibler for service as Chair of the TrusteesBoard of the Putnam funds.Trustees.

(6)(5) Includes additional compensation to Mr. Putnam for service as Chair of the Contract Committee.

(7)(6) Includes additional compensation to Mr. Singh for service as Chair of the Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee.

(8)(7) Mr. Reynolds is an “interested person”"interested person" of the funds and Putnam Management.

Why should you vote for your fund’s nominees?

Your current Trustees are independent, experienced, and highly qualified fiduciaries who exercise strong fund governance practices.

Independent

• The Chair of your fund, Kenneth R. Leibler, is independent of Putnam Management and has served on the Board for 1618 years. He also has extensive experience in the financial services industry, including as Chief Executive Officer of a major asset management organization, and has served as a director of various public and private companies;

• 10 of the 1112 Trustee nominees and both of the nominees who do not currently serve as Trustees, are independent of Putnam Management; and

• The Independent Trustees are assisted by an independent administrative staff and legal counsel who are selected by the Independent Trustees and are independent of Putnam Management.

Highly Qualified

• The nominees have significant current and past related industry experience, and have a demonstrated history of actively pursuing the interests of fund shareholders;

• The Board includes individuals with substantial professional accomplishments and prior experience in a variety of fields, including investment management, economics, finance, energy, and professional services; and

• The Board has taken actions that directly benefit shareholders — liquidity events such as mergers and tender offers when in the best interests of all shareholders; a share repurchase program that has made a meaningful contribution to investment return; a significant decrease in 2006 in management fee rates for certain Putnam funds; and various efforts to improve shareholder relations.

Strong Governance Practices

• The Board includes a combination of long-tenured and newer members, bringing diverse perspectives to fund oversight;

• The Board has a well-established committee and oversight structure for the Putnam funds, which has been developed over a long period of time; and

• The funds do not have a staggered board structure or other takeover defenses.structure. Every Trustee stands for election at each annual meeting of shareholders.

What is the voting requirement for electing Trustees?

For Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, if a quorum of preferred shares is present at the annual meeting, the two nominees for election as Trustees by the holders of the preferred shares, voting as a separate class, who receive the greatest number of affirmative votes cast by holders of the preferred shares will be elected Trustees. If a quorum of common and preferred shares is present, the applicable number of nominees (see Proposal 1b) for election as Trustees by the holders of the preferred shares and common shares, voting together as a single class, who receive the greatest number of affirmative votes cast by the holders of the preferred shares and common shares, voting together as a single class, will be elected as Trustees.

For Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust and Putnam Premier Income Trust, if a quorum is present at the annual meeting, the applicable number of nominees (see Proposal 1b) for election as Trustees who receive the greatest number of affirmative votes cast by shareholders will be elected as Trustees.

The Trustees unanimously recommend that shareholders vote “FOR” the election of your fund’s nominees.

2. CONVERTING PUTNAM MANAGED MUNICIPAL INCOME TRUST TO AN OPEN-END INVESTMENT COMPANY AND APPROVING CERTAIN RELATED AMENDMENTS TO ITS DECLARATION OF TRUST

What is this proposal?

Shareholders of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust will have the opportunity to vote at the meeting on the question of whether Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust should be converted from a closed-end fund to an open-end fund. If the conversion is approved, after the conversion occurs Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s shares would be redeemable directly by the fund at NAV, eliminating any discount of market price to NAV. In order to address the organizational changes necessitated by converting from a closed-end fund to an open-end fund, approval of this proposal would also authorize the Trustees to make such amendments to Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s Declaration of Trust as they may deem necessary or appropriate, generally with a view to conforming the fund’s Declaration of Trust to the form used by Putnam open-end funds.

Why is this question being submitted to shareholders?

As described further below, as a closed-end fund, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s shares are bought and sold in the securities markets at prevailing prices, which may be equal to, less than, or greater than NAV per share. Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s Declaration of Trust requires that its shareholders be given the opportunity to vote on a proposal to convert the fund from a closed-end fund to an open-end fund if the fund’s common shares have traded at an average discount of more than 10% from its NAV per share during the last twelve calendar weeks of the preceding fiscal year (measured as of the last trading day in each week). The average discount from NAV per share at which Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s shares traded for the 12 weeks ended October 27, 2023 was -10.40%, thereby requiring this proposal to be submitted to shareholders.

In accordance with its Declaration of Trust, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust has previously submitted identical proposals to shareholders at the shareholders’ annual meetings held on the dates appearing in the table below, most recently in 2019. Each proposal failed to obtain the necessary vote (the affirmative vote of a majority of outstanding shares is required in order to pass the proposal):

What do the Trustees recommend?

Based on the information available to them, the Trustees of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust believe that in the current circumstances the continued operation of the fund as a closed-end fund is in the best long-term interests of the fund’s shareholders. Accordingly, the Trustees of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust unanimously recommend that shareholders vote “AGAINST” this proposal.

Why are the Trustees recommending a vote against this proposal?

At a meeting of the Board of Trustees held on January 25 and 26, 2024, the Trustees considered the following factors in recommending a vote against converting Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust to an open-end fund:

Shareholders consciously chose a closed-end investment vehicle. The Trustees presume that shareholders consciously chose to invest in Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust from among a broad array of investment products available in the marketplace, including open-end funds that invest in similar asset classes, with an understanding of the potential advantages and disadvantages of the closed-end structure. Since the common shares of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, shareholders of the fund are able to trade their shares freely throughout the day in response to their individual needs and market developments. As a general matter, absent extraordinary circumstances, the Trustees do not believe it is appropriate to disturb a fundamental investment choice made by shareholders. In this regard, the Trustees considered that, each time an identical proposal to convert Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust from closed-end to open-end status was submitted to shareholders in the past, fewer than 10% of the fund’s outstanding shares voted in favor of converting the fund in any year.

Investment advantages associated with closed-end structure. The Trustees believe that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s closed-end structure provides inherent investment advantages not available to open-end fund investors:

• Lower transaction costs (relating to sales and redemptions). As a closed-end fund, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust has a stable pool of capital, and does not experience the cash flows associated with sales and redemptions of open-end fund shares. Cash flows can create transaction costs that are borne by open-end fund shareholders. These transaction costs include the costs associated with buying securities following shareholder subscriptions into the fund and the costs associated with selling securities to meet shareholder redemptions.

• More assets at work; fund can be more fully invested. Because Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s shares are not redeemable directly from the fund at NAV like an open-end fund’s shares, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust is not required to hold cash and/or short-term, lower-yielding investments in anticipation of possible redemptions, and generally can be more fully invested in securities that Putnam Management believes are appropriate for the fund. In addition, because Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust is not engaged in a continuous offering of shares like an open-end fund, it is not required to accept cash subscriptions that may require temporary investment in cash and/or short-term, lower-yielding investments pending investment in securities that Putnam Management believes are appropriate for the fund.

• Enhanced investment flexibility with respect to “illiquid” securities. Because they are required to maintain the ability to honor redemption requests, open-end funds are prohibited by the 1940 Act from investing more than 15% of their assets in illiquid securities. Closed-end funds such as Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust are not subject to this restriction, although generally the fund has not utilized this flexibility to a significant extent. Illiquid securities may offer attractive investment returns to investors, such as closed-end funds, that are able to hold these securities long term.

Performance relative to comparable open-end fund. Putnam Management has advised the Trustees of its belief that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust may be viewed as comparable to Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund, an open-end fund managed by Putnam Management. Putnam Management noted that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust has employed since inception an investment strategy that is similar to that of Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund, notwithstanding that the investment portfolio may have diverged materially from time to time from that of Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund.

The Trustees considered the performance of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund. Specifically, they considered that on an absolute basis, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust has outperformed Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund over the one- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2023 (based on performance at NAV), but underperformed Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund, over the three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2023 (based on performance at NAV), and that on a risk-adjusted basis, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust has performed similarly to Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund over the one-, three-, five-, and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2023 (risk-adjusted performance refers to various metrics, such as a fund’s “Sharpe Ratio” and “Information Ratio,” that seek to measure the volatility of a fund’s performance). Putnam Management has advised the Trustees of its belief that, while past performance does not predict future returns and while the investment strategies pursued by, and the performance of, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust may diverge materially from that of Putnam Tax-Free High Yield in the future, Putnam Management continues to believe in the investment advantages of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s closed-end structure.

Additional information relating to Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s performance is provided below under the section entitled How has Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust performed?

What does it mean when fund shares trade at a discount?

Since closed-end funds are not required to redeem their common shares, investors in closed-end funds who wish to liquidate their investment must sell their shares in the secondary markets. To promote the availability of active secondary markets for shareholders who wish to sell their shares, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust has listed its common shares for trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Prices in these secondary markets are influenced by several factors, including investment returns at NAV, fund distributions, changes in supply and demand for the fund’s shares, changing market conditions, and investor perceptions of the fund or its investment manager, and fluctuate over time. Closed-end fund shares generally trade at a discount to their NAV but at times may trade at a premium.

As indicated in the table below, while Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s common shares have traded at a discount to their NAV over more recent periods, the discount has fluctuated over time, and at times the fund’s shares have traded at a premium to NAV. In order to show the range of discounts and premiums at which Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s shares have historically traded, the table below presents both the widest and narrowest discount (or premium) to NAV at which the fund’s shares closed on any trading day over the course of each of the ten most recent calendar years. Thus, the “Highest Market Price” column presents the lowest discount or, if the fund traded above NAV during the year, the highest premium achieved in a given year, and the “Lowest Market Price” column presents the highest discount or, if the fund only traded above NAV during the year, the lowest premium. In addition, the “Average Discount/Premium” column presents the average daily differential between market price and NAV over the course of the years presented in the table.

Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust

* The Average Discount/Premium for each calendar year represents the sum of all data points regarding daily discount/premium (determined on the basis of (market price - NAV)/NAV, with NAV and market price determined at the close of each business day) in a calendar year, divided by the number of business days in that calendar year.

How has Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust performed?

The following table summarizes the annualized total return of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust for the periods shown based on the NAV and the market price of its shares. The table also shows the performance of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s benchmark indices, the median performance of funds in Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s peer group of closed-end funds as determined by Lipper, Inc., an LSEG Company, an independent fund rating agency, and the performance of Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund, an open-end fund management by Putnam Management with a comparable investment strategy. Of course, past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Total Return (Annualized) for Periods Ended December 31, 2023

What options have the Trustees considered in formulating their recommendation?

In their deliberations regarding this proposal, the Trustees considered other possible actions that would eliminate the discount by abandoning the closed-end structure, including the following:

• Merging Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust into Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund;

• Open-ending Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust; and

• Liquidating Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust.

For the reasons discussed below, the Trustees concluded that the direct and indirect costs of each of these possible actions would likely outweigh the benefits to shareholders of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust at this time. The Trustees noted that different circumstances and market conditions could warrant a different conclusion in the future.

Open-Ending Merger. The Trustees considered the possible merger of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust into Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund, an open-end fund managed by Putnam Management that has a comparable investment strategy. The Trustees observed that such a merger transaction would be expected to provide Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust shareholders a modest expense ratio savings due to the somewhat larger size of Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund. However, the Trustees determined that the ongoing expense ratio savings were modest when considered in light of the loss of the potential investment advantages that shareholders may realize by investing in a closed-end fund relative to an open-end fund. Since Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust would be required to redeem its preferred shares prior to an open-ending merger, Putnam Management advised the Trustees that it anticipated that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust would likely incur meaningful transaction costs associated with selling securities to redeem its preferred shares. The Trustees noted that these transaction costs would be expected to significantly reduce the expense ratio savings that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust shareholders could realize in the near-term in an open-ending merger. The Trustees concluded that, in light of the relatively modest expense ratio savings as compared to the loss of ongoing investment advantages, an open-ending merger was not advisable at this time.

Open-Ending. The Trustees determined that an open-ending of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust would generally present the same costs and benefits to its shareholders as a merger, with certain exceptions that would render an open-ending a comparatively worse outcome for shareholders relative to a merger. In this regard, they noted that, in contrast to the lower operating expenses that would be expected for closed-end fund shareholders in connection with a merger, open-ending the fund would likely result in an increase in the expense ratio through the significant reduction in the fund’s asset size following anticipated significant redemptions from shareholders. The Trustees also considered that conversion to an open-end fund may lead to the imposition of 12b-1 fees or other distribution-related expenses that are not currently applicable to closed-end funds, as well as a higher investor servicing fee schedule than is currently applicable to closed-end funds. The Trustees noted the possibility of the newly open-end fund experiencing increased assets over time, since open-end funds may continuously offer new shares to the public and have the ability to increase in size. Growth in the fund’s size following a conversion to an open-end fund could result in efficiencies and the ability to spread fixed costs over a larger pool of assets. However, the Trustees noted their belief that the asset growth prospects for such a new open-end fund were highly speculative.

The anticipated significant redemptions from Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust shareholders would impose significant liquidity demands on the fund, likely resulting in a combination of (i) investment in cash or highly liquid securities pending these redemptions and (ii) the sale of the most liquid securities in the fund’s portfolio to meet these redemption requests. As a result, the expected significant liquidity demands would likely alter the investment strategies that the fund pursues in a manner that is detrimental to the interests of remaining shareholders. On an ongoing basis, daily liquidity demands would alter the manner in which the fund is managed; see Why are the Trustees recommending a vote against conversion to open-end status? for a discussion of the investment advantages associated with the closed-end structure that would be forgone in connection with an open-ending.

The Trustees concluded that the direct and indirect costs, both quantitative and qualitative, of an open-ending transaction would outweigh the benefits of such a transaction for Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust shareholders at this time.

Liquidation. The Trustees also considered the possibility of liquidating Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and distributing pro rata its remaining assets (after the payment of expenses, liabilities, etc.) to the fund’s shareholders. The Trustees observed that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust generally represents an investment strategy reflective of Putnam Management’s strong fixed income heritage and expertise. The Trustees noted further that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust has served shareholders reasonably well, possessing a solid performance track record, and that liquidation would deprive its shareholders of the investment choice they have made. In addition, they considered the possibility that there could be adverse tax consequences to some shareholders from a liquidation (i.e., recognition of capital gains). They concluded that liquidation should be viewed as inadvisable at this time for these reasons.

In considering these possible actions and the current “open-ending” proposal, the Trustees have considered the fact that all shareholders who purchased Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s shares presumably made their choice from among a broad array of investment products available in the marketplace, including open-end funds investing in similar asset classes, with an understanding of the potential advantages and disadvantages of the closed-end structure. Thus, in considering whether to recommend a fundamental change in the structure of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and its investment characteristics, the Trustees have considered whether the closed-end structure of the fund continues to offer the investment advantages contemplated when the fund was originally offered to the marketplace. Especially in light of the steps to attempt to enhance shareholder returns described in more detail below, the Trustees have concluded, based on the information available to them, that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust remains a viable investment vehicle and that recent discount levels do not currently justify abandoning the advantages of the closed-end structure by converting the fund to an open-end investment company.

How do the Trustees address trading discounts while maintaining the closed-end structure?

The Trustees have over the years approved a broad range of actions in an effort to reduce or eliminate trading discounts, including a number of actions that were implemented consistent with Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s closed-end structure, including:

• Repurchases by the fund of its shares at prevailing market prices;

• Tender offers by the fund to repurchase its shares at a price above market and below NAV;

• Communications with the marketplace regarding the benefits of investing in the fund in an effort to increase investor demand for the fund’s shares; and

• Amendment of the fund’s dividend policy to establish a targeted monthly distribution rate for common shares.

While these actions may have had a temporary effect on Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s trading discount, there is little industry experience that would suggest a long-term impact. Some of these actions also tend to reduce Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s size over time, which may in turn result in an increase in the fund’s expense ratio and a constraint on the fund’s investment flexibility. To the extent that shares are repurchased at prices below NAV, however, the repurchases enhance the NAV of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s remaining common shares and the total return at NAV for the remaining common shareholders.

Repurchases of Fund shares. Recognizing the benefit of share repurchases for less than NAV, the Trustees in 2005 authorized for all of the Putnam closed-end funds, including Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, a program to conduct open-market repurchases of their outstanding common shares. The Trustees have regularly renewed the program, most recently in September 2023, when the Trustees renewed the repurchase program to permit the funds to repurchase up to 10% of their outstanding common shares (based on shares outstanding as of September 30, 2023) over the twelve months ending September 30, 2024 subject to certain conditions. The Trustees periodically review the program’s impact on investment performance and trading discounts, including

information provided by Putnam Management regarding the increases in the NAV of remaining shares caused by share repurchases.

The table below shows the aggregate dollar gain to Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust resulting from share repurchases for less than NAV per share, as well as the approximate annualized contribution (gross of fees) of the share repurchase program to the fund’s returns at NAV from October 25, 2005 (the date shares were first repurchased) through December 31, 2023. The table also shows Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s total return, annualized and net of fees, over the same period.

* “Benefit to Fund of Share Repurchases ($)” is a summation of the daily dollar gains/loss from shares repurchased. The first day profit is calculated using the trade date purchase price.

** “Contribution of Share Repurchases to Fund’s Total Return (Annualized) at NAV” and “Fund’s Total Return (Annualized) at NAV (net of fees)” are compounded returns. The returns are daily profits divided by the previous day’s NAV.

The Trustees believe that the record of the repurchase program to date supports the assertion that share repurchases represent an attractive investment opportunity for Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, although the degree to which repurchases benefit the fund depends entirely on the level of trading discounts at which the fund’s shares trade. In addition, there is no guarantee that share repurchases will cause the market price of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s shares to increase or narrow any existing discounts. The Trustees will continue to monitor the repurchase program and review its impact on Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s investment performance and on trading discounts. The Trustees will also continue to evaluate additional actions that might be taken in an effort to reduce trading discounts.

What are additional differences between a closed-end and an open-end fund?

In addition to the differences noted above, shareholders evaluating this proposal may wish to consider the following:

• Annual shareholder meetings. Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust is currently required by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange to hold annual meetings of shareholders. Conversion of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust to open-end status would result in termination of the fund’s listing on the New York Stock Exchange, with the result that the fund would no longer be required to hold annual meetings.

• Dividend reinvestment. Shareholders of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust currently have the option of participating in the fund’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan, under which cash distributions paid by the fund are generally reinvested through the purchase of additional fund shares at market prices, which currently reflect a discount from NAV. (At times when Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s shares are trading at a premium over their NAV, such reinvestments are made at the higher of NAV or 95% of market value.) Shareholders of Putnam open-end funds have the option to reinvest their distributions in additional shares at NAV at all times. If Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust were to convert to open-end status, shareholders would no longer be able to reinvest dividends at a price below NAV per share because shares of open-end funds may only be purchased and redeemed at NAV.

• Exchange privileges. Shareholders of retail open-end funds in the Putnam family of funds currently have the privilege of exchanging their investment at NAV and without sales charges for shares of the same class of more than 80 retail open-end funds in the Putnam group. Shareholders of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust do not have that privilege.

• Distribution expenses. If shareholders approve a conversion to open-end status, in order to increase assets, the Trustees would likely consider commencing a continuous offering of shares of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and might also recommend, subject to shareholder approval, that the fund adopt a distribution plan under Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the current plans for Class A shares of Putnam open-end funds, Putnam Retail Management, those funds’ principal underwriter, receives annual distribution fees of 0.25% of net assets, though the applicable plans permit fees of up to 0.35%.

What changes to Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s Declaration of Trust and other effects would follow if shareholders vote to convert the fund to an open-end investment company?

• Changes to the fund’s Declaration of Trust. Conversion of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust from a closed-end fund to an open-end fund would require certain changes to the fund’s Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust (“Declaration of Trust”) and, therefore, a vote in favor of conversion would also authorize the Trustees to amend the fund’s Declaration of Trust to reflect these changes.

The Declaration of Trust would be amended to require Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust to purchase all shares offered to it for redemption at a price equal to the NAV of the shares next determined, less any redemption fee or other charges fixed by the Trustees. In addition, to the extent permitted by applicable law, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust would be authorized, at its option, to redeem shares held in a shareholder’s account at NAV if at any time a shareholder owned shares in an amount either less than or greater than, as the case may be, an amount determined by the Trustees. Notwithstanding this provision, all shares would be redeemable at a shareholder’s option.

The Declaration of Trust would also be amended to eliminate certain provisions that relate specifically to Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s closed-end status, such as the conversion provision that has triggered this proposal. In addition, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s Declaration of Trust and Bylaws would be amended to remove provisions allowing the issuance of, and otherwise governing the operations of, preferred shares. Finally, if shareholders were to vote to convert Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust to an open-end fund, the provision in the fund’s Declaration of Trust requiring that Trustees be elected annually at the annual shareholder meeting or at a special meeting in lieu thereof would be eliminated. The Trustees would also make certain necessary technical and non-material changes to the Declaration of Trust.

• 12b-1 Plan. As discussed above, if this proposal is approved by shareholders, to support the marketing of fund shares, the Trustees might also recommend, subject to shareholder approval, that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust adopt a distribution plan under Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The plan the Trustees might recommend could resemble the plans of other Putnam open-end funds, under which Putnam Retail Management, those funds’ principal underwriter, currently receives, with respect to Class A shares, annual distribution fees of 0.25% of net assets, although the applicable plans permit fees of up to 0.35%.

• Timing. If this proposal is approved by shareholders, a number of steps would be required to implement the conversion, including the preparation, filing and effectiveness of an open-end fund registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 covering the offering of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s shares (the “Open-End Registration Statement”), the establishment of distribution arrangements, and the negotiation and execution of a new or amended agreement with the fund’s transfer agent. Shareholders of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust would bear the costs of the conversion to open-end status. In addition, subject to any necessary Trustee and shareholder approvals, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust may propose changes to its investment management agreement. Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust anticipates that the conversion would become effective during the fall of 2024, although there is no assurance of this, and that the discount, if any,

at which the fund’s shares trade in relation to its NAV would likely be reduced in anticipation of the ability to redeem shares at NAV upon the completion of the conversion. It is expected that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s amended Declaration of Trust would not be filed and effective until the Open-End Registration Statement has become effective.

• Shareholder Approval of Certain Items. Should Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust convert to an open-end investment company, certain aspects of the operation of the fund subsequent to its conversion may need to be approved by the fund’s shareholders before the effectiveness of the conversion. These matters may include, among other things, making changes in Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s fundamental investment policies or investment management contract and associated fee and expense arrangements, and considering the adoption of a distribution plan under Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act as described above.

Certain other legal, accounting and other costs would be incurred in connection with the conversion of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust to open-end status. These direct costs would be borne by Putnam Management Municipal Income Trust, but would not be expected to increase materially the fund’s expense ratio.

What is the voting requirement for approving the conversion?

Approval of the conversion of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust to open-end status and of the related amendments to the fund’s Declaration of Trust requires the “yes” vote of a majority (greater than 50%) of the fund’s outstanding shares.

If approved, the conversion would become effective following compliance with all necessary regulatory requirements under federal and state law. Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust would seek to complete this process as soon as reasonably practicable. Until the conversion, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust’s shares would continue to be listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange.

If the conversion is not approved, will Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust continue in its current form?

Yes. In the event that shareholders do not approve the conversion of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust to open-end status, the fund would continue to operate as a closed-end fund.

Based on the information available to them, the Trustees believe that in the current circumstances the continued operation of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust as a closed-end fund is in the best long-term interests of its shareholders, and unanimously recommend a vote “AGAINST” the conversion of the fund to open-end status at this time.

Further Information About Voting and the Annual Meeting

Location. As part of our effort to maintain a safe and healthy environment at the annual meeting, each fund and the Trustees are closely monitoring statements issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cdc.gov) regarding the coronavirusCOVID-19 pandemic. For that reason, the Trustees reserve the right to reconsider the date, time and/or means of convening your fund’s meeting. Subject to any restrictions imposed by applicable law, the Trustees may choose to conduct the meeting solely by means of remote communications, or may hold a “hybrid” meeting where some participants attend in person and others attend by means of remote communications. If the Trustees choose to change the date, time and/or means of convening your fund’s meeting, the fund will announce the decision to do so in advance, and details on how to participate will be issued by press release and filed with the SEC as additional proxy material. Attendees are also encouraged to review guidance from public health authorities on this issue.

Meeting Quorum and Methods of Tabulation. The shareholders of each fund vote separately with respect to the proposals. For Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust and Putnam Premier Income Trust, the presence in person or by proxy of a majority of the shares entitled to vote constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business with respect to any proposal at the annual meeting. For Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, thirty percent of the shares entitled to vote constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business with respect to any proposal at the annual meeting, except that for any proposal on which the preferred shares or common shares vote as separate classes, then thirty percent of the shares of each class entitled to vote constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business with respect to that proposal by that class.

The tellers will count the total number of votes cast “for” approval of each proposal for purposes of determining whether sufficient affirmative votes have been cast. Shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions and “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares held by brokers or nominees as to which (i) instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or the persons entitled to vote and (ii) the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting authority on a particular matter) will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote on the matter for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Because broker-dealers (in the absence of specific authorization from their customers) arequorum, but do not expectedcount as votes cast for a proposal. With respect to have discretionary authority to vote any shares owned beneficially by their customers, there are unlikely to be any “broker non-votes” at the Meeting. Broker non-votes would otherwise have the same effect as abstentions (that is, they would be treated as being presentProposal 1a and

entitled to vote on the matter for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum). Neither 1b, neither abstentions nor broker non-votes have an effect on the outcome of the proposal. With respect to Proposal 1a2, abstentions and broker non-votes have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes may result in Proposal 2 not being approved, even though the votes cast in favor would have been sufficient to approve the proposal if some or 1b.

all of the broker non-votes had been withheld.

The documents that authorize Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company or Putnam Investor Services, Inc. to act as Trustee or servicing agent for certain individual retirement accounts (including traditional, Roth and SEP IRAs, 403(b)(7) accounts and Coverdell Education Savings Accounts) provide that if an account owner does not submit voting instructions for his or her shares, Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company or Putnam Investor Services will vote the shares in the same proportions as other shareholders with similar accounts have submitted voting instructions for their shares. Shareholders should be aware that this practice, known as “echo-voting,” may have the effect of increasing the likelihood that a proposal will be acted upon (approved or disapproved) and that Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company or Putnam Investor Services, each of which is an affiliate of Putnam Management, may benefit indirectly from the approval or disapproval, in accordance with the Trustees’ recommendations, of the proposals.

Shareholders who object to a proposal in this proxy statementProxy Statement will not be entitled under Massachusetts law or your fund’sthe Agreement and Declaration of Trust of the particular fund to demand payment for, or an appraisal of, their shares.

The Amended and Restated Bylaws of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust each include a provision (together, the “Control Share Provision”) pursuant to which, in summary, a shareholder who obtains beneficial ownership of fund shares in a “Control Share Acquisition” may exercise voting rights with respect to such shares only to the extent the authorization of such voting rights is approved by other shareholders of the fund. However, the Control Share Provision is not in effect and will have no impact whatsoever on voting at the annual meeting.

The Control Share Provision is primarily intended to protect the interests of the fund and its shareholders by limiting the risk that the fund will become subject to undue influence by activist investors. As described further below, the Control Share Provision does not eliminate voting rights for shares acquired in Control Share Acquisitions, but rather, it entrusts a fund’s other “non-interested” shareholders with determining whether to approve the authorization of voting rights for such shares. Subject to various conditions and exceptions, the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust define a “Control Share Acquisition” to include an acquisition of fund shares (other than remarketed preferred shares of a series existing as of September 18, 2020) that, but for the Control Share Provision, would entitle the beneficial owner, upon the acquisition of such shares, to vote or direct the voting of shares having voting power in the election of Trustees (except for elections of Trustees by preferred shareholders of the fund voting as a separate class) within any of the following ranges: (i)

one-tenth or more, but less than one-fifth of all voting power; (ii) one-fifth or more, but less than one-third of all voting power; (iii) one-third or more, but less than a majority of all voting power; or (iv) a majority or more of all voting power.

Shares acquired before September 18, 2020 are excluded from the definition of Control Share Acquisition, although such shares are included in assessing whether any subsequent share acquisition exceeds one of the enumerated thresholds. Subject to various conditions and procedural requirements set forth in the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, including the delivery of a “Control Share Acquisition Statement” to the fund’s Clerk setting forth certain required information, a shareholder who obtains beneficial ownership of shares in a Control Share Acquisition generally may request a vote of fund shareholders (excluding such acquiring shareholder and certain other interested shareholders) to approve the authorization of voting rights for such shares at the next annual meeting of fund shareholders, notice of which has not been given before the fund has received the Control Share Acquisition Statement.

On February 23, 2023, the Trustees of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust each determined to exempt all prior, and, until further notice, new purchases of the funds’ shares that might otherwise be deemed Control Share Acquisitions under the Control Share Provision. Thus, as stated above, the Control Share Provision currently has no effect, and will not affect voting at the annual meeting in any way.

Special Rule for Proportional Voting for Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust and Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust. For funds listed on the New York Stock Exchange that have outstanding preferred shares, in accordance with the rules of the exchange, brokerage firms may vote for (or against)or against a proposal, on behalf of their clients who beneficially own the remarketed or auction rate preferred shares and from whom they have not received voting instructions, in the same proportion as votes for (and against)and against the proposal that have been received from other holders of preferred shares if (i) a minimum of 30% of the outstanding preferred shares have been voted by the holders of preferred shares, (ii) the holders of less than 10% of the outstanding preferred shares have voted against the proposal, and (iii) for any proposal on which common and preferred shares vote together as a single class, the holders of the common shares have approved the proposal.

Other business. The Trustees know of no matters other than those described in this proxy statement to be brought before the annual meeting. If, however, any other matters properly come before the annual meeting, proxies will be voted on these matters in accordance with the judgment of the persons named in the enclosed proxy card(s).

Simultaneous meetings. The annual meeting of shareholders of your fund is called to be held at the same time as the meetings of shareholders of the other Putnam closed-end funds. It is anticipated that all annual meetings will be held simultaneously. However, if any shareholder at the annual meeting objects to the holding of a simultaneous meeting and moves for an adjournment of the meeting to a time promptly after the simultaneous meetings, the persons named as proxies will vote in favor of adjournment.

Solicitation of proxies. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, the Trustees of your fund and employees of Putnam Management and Putnam Investor Services, as well as their agents, may solicit proxies in person or by telephone. Your fund may arrange to have a proxy solicitation firm call you to record your voting instructions by telephone. The procedures for voting proxies by telephone are designed to authenticate shareholders’ identities, to allow them to authorize the voting of their shares in accordance with their instructions, and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded. Shareholders would be called at the phone number Putnam Management or Putnam Investor Services has in its records for their accounts (or that Putnam Management or Putnam Investor Services obtains from agents acting on behalf of financial intermediaries, in the case of shares held in street name through a bank, broker or other financial intermediary) and would be given an opportunity to authenticate their identities and to authorize the proxies to vote their shares at the annual meeting in accordance with their instructions. To ensure that shareholders’ instructions have been recorded correctly, they will also receive a confirmation of their instructions in the mail. A special toll-free number will be available in case the information contained in the confirmation is incorrect. Your fund has been

advised by counsel that these procedures are consistent with the requirements of applicable law. If these procedures were subject to a successful legal challenge, such votes would not be counted at the annual meeting. Your fund is unaware of any such challenge at this time.

Shareholders have the opportunity to submit their voting instructions over the Internetinternet by using a program provided by a third-party vendor hiredselected by Putnam Management or by automated telephone service. To vote online using the Internet,internet, please access the Internetinternet address listed on the proxy card and follow the instructions on the Internetinternet site. To record your voting instructions using the automated telephone service, use the toll-free number listed on your proxy card. The Internetinternet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholder identities, to allow shareholders to give their voting instructions, and to confirm that shareholders’ instructions have been recorded properly.

Your fund’s Trustees have adopted a general policy of maintaining confidentiality in the voting of proxies. Consistent with this policy, your fund may solicit proxies from shareholders who have not voted their shares or who have abstained from voting, including brokers and nominees.

Expense of the solicitation. For managing the funds’ overall proxy campaign, ASTEQ Fund Solutions 48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10005(“EQ”) will receive a proxy management fee plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. AST Fund SolutionsEQ will also receive fees in connection with assembling, mailing and transmitting the notice of meeting, proxy statement and related materials on behalf of the funds, tabulating those votes that are received, and any solicitation of additional votes. While the fees received by AST Fund SolutionsEQ will vary based on the level of additional solicitation necessary to achieve quorum and shareholder approval of the Trustees’ recommendations, the project management fees paid to AST Fund SolutionsEQ are estimated to be approximately $5,607$1,466 for Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, $6,548$1,466 for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, $5,157$1,466 for Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, and $9,245$1,466 for Putnam Premier Income Trust (approximately $26,557$5,864 in the aggregate for all funds). In addition, banks, brokers or other financial intermediaries holding shares as nomineenominees will be reimbursed, upon request, for their reasonable expenses in sending solicitation materials to the principals of the accounts and tabulating those instructions that are received. After reimbursement of these expenses, it is estimated that Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, and Putnam Premier Income Trust will incur total costs of approximately $25,997, $23,914, $22,338,$25,010, $24,417, $25,786, and $49,188,$47,616, respectively, in connection with the proxy campaign (approximately $121,437$122,829 in the aggregate for all funds). Other costs associated with the proxy campaign include the expenses of the preparation and printing of proxy materials.materials, and postage, which are estimated to be approximately $15,000. Each fund is bearing all of its proxy campaign costs.

Revocation of proxies. Giving your proxy, whether by returning the proxy card or providing voting instructions over the Internetinternet or by telephone, does not affect your right to attend and vote at the annual meeting.meeting and vote. Proxies, including proxies given by telephone or over the internet, may be revoked at any time before they are voted, either (i) by a written revocation received by the Clerk of your fund, (ii) by properly executing and submitting a later-dated proxy, (iii) by recording later-dated voting instructions by telephone or via the Internet,internet, or (iv) by attending the annual meeting and voting at the meeting.in person. If your shares are held in street name through a bank, broker or other financial intermediary, please check your voting instruction form or contact your bank, broker or other financial intermediary for instructions on how to change or revoke your vote.

Dates for receipt of shareholders’ proposals for subsequent meetings of shareholders. It is currently anticipated that your fund’s next annual meeting of shareholders will be held on April 21, 2023,25, 2025, although the Trustees of your fund reserve the right to set an earlier or later date for the annual meeting for the 2022–2023next fiscal year. Shareholder proposals whichthat are intended to be included in the proxy statement for that meeting and presented at the 20232025 annual meeting must have been received by your fund on or before November 22, 2022.25, 2024. In order for a shareholder proposal to be included in the proxy statement, both the submitting shareholder and the proposal itself must satisfy the requirements set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act.Act of 1934. The fund may exclude from the proxy materials and

consideration at a meeting certain proposals as permitted by Securities and Exchange Commission rules and state law. Shareholders who wish to make a proposal at the 20232025 annual meeting without including the proposal in the fund’s proxy statement must ensure that the proposal was received by your fund in good order and in compliance with all applicable legal requirements, including the requirements set forth in your fund’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, between January 21, 202326, 2025 and February 20, 2023.25, 2025. You may obtain a copy of your fund’s Amended and Restated Bylaws by submitting a request in writing to The Putnam Funds, 100 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110.

Postponement and Adjournment. To the extent permitted by each fund’s Declaration of Trust and Amended and Restated Bylaws, any meeting of shareholders may be postponed or cancelled by the Trustees upon public notice before the time scheduled for suchthe meeting.

In addition to any ability that the persons named as proxies may have to propose and/or vote on an adjournment of any meeting of shareholders as described below, to the extent permitted by each fund’s Declaration of Trust and Amended and Restated Bylaws, any meeting of shareholders may, by action of the chair of the meeting, be adjourned from time to time without notice (other than announcement at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken) with respect to one or more matters to be considered at the meeting to a designated date (which may be more than 120 days after the date initially set for the meeting), time and place, whether or not a quorum is present with respect to the matter. Upon motion of the chair of the meeting, the question of adjournment may (but need not) be submitted to a vote of the shareholders, and in that case, any adjournment with respect to one or more matters must be approved by the vote of holders of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote with respect to the matter or matters to be adjourned and, if approved, such adjournment shall take place without further notice (other than announcement at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken). If the quorum required quorumfor the meeting has not been met, the persons named as proxies may propose adjournment of the meeting and vote all shares that they are entitled to vote in favor of such adjournment. If the quorum required for the meeting has been met, but sufficient votes in accordance with the Trustees’ recommendations are not received by the time scheduled for the meeting, the persons named as proxies may also propose adjournment of the meeting with respect to any or all proposals in order to permit solicitation of additional proxies. The persons named as proxies will vote in favor of adjournment those proxies that they are entitled to vote in accordance with the Trustees’ recommendation. They will vote against adjournment those proxies required to be voted contrary to the Trustees’ recommendation. Unless a proxy is otherwise limited in this regard, any shares present and entitled to vote at a meeting including shares that are represented by broker non-votes, may, at the discretion of the proxies named therein, be voted in favor of such an adjournment. Adjournments may be proposed for a reasonable period or periods to permit further solicitation of proxies or for any other reason. The funds will bear the costs of any additional solicitation and of any adjourned session. Any proposal for which sufficient votes consistent with the Trustees’ recommendation have been received may be acted upon and considered final regardless of whether the annual meeting is adjourned to permit additional solicitation with respect to any other proposal that may properly come before the meeting.

The record date initially set for a meeting will continue to apply to any adjourned or postponed session of that meeting, unless the Trustees fix a new record date for the meeting. If a new record date is fixed for a meeting, any proxy received by a fund from a shareholder who was a shareholder of record on both the record date originally set for the meeting and the new record date for the meeting will remain in full force and effect unless explicitly revoked by the shareholder.

Duplicate mailings. As permitted by SEC rules, Putnam Management’s policythe funds’ practice is to send a single copy of the proxy statement to shareholders who share the same last name and address, unless a shareholder previously has requested otherwise. Separate proxy cards will be included with the proxy statement for each account registered at that address. If you would prefer to receive your own copy of the proxy statement, please contact Putnam InvestmentsEQ Fund Solutions by phone at 1-877-536-15551-800-967-5051 or contact Putnam Investments by mail at P.O. Box 219697, Kansas City, MO 64121-9697.

Financial information. Your fund’s Clerk will furnish to you, upon request and without charge, a copy of the fund’s annual report for its most recent fiscal year, and a copy of its semiannual report for any subsequent semiannual period. You may direct these requests to Putnam Investments, P.O. Box 219697,

Kansas City, MO 64121-9697 or by phone at 1-877-536-1555.1-800-225-1581. You may also access copies of these reports by visiting Putnam’s website at www.putnam.com/individual.

Fund Information

Putnam Investments. Investment Management, LLC. Putnam Management is the funds’ investment adviser and is an indirect, wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam Investments, LLC (“Putnam Investments”). The funds do not haveFranklin Resources, Inc. Franklin Resources, Inc., whose principal executive offices are at One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403, is a distributor or principal underwriter. The Desmarais Family Residuary Trust, a trust established pursuant to the Last Will and Testament of The Honourable Paul G. Desmarais, indirectly holds approximately 50.9% of the voting rights of Power Corporation of Canada. Power Corporation of Canada is an internationalglobal investment management and holding company that focuses on financial services in North America, Europe and Asia. Power Financial Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Power Corporation of Canada, is an international management and holding company with interests in financial services and asset management businesses in Canada, the United States and Europe. Power Financial Corporation in turn owns, directly and indirectly, voting securities to which are attached approximately 65% of the voting rights attached to all of the outstanding voting shares of Great-West Lifeco Inc., an international financial services holding company with interests in life insurance, health insurance, retirement and investment services, asset management and reinsurance businesses. Great-West Lifeco Inc. indirectly owns a majority interest in, and all of the voting shares of, Putnam Investments through a series of subsidiaries.

organization operating as Franklin Templeton. The address of each of Putnam Investments and Putnam Management is 100 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. The address of The Desmarais Family Residuary Trust is 759 Victoria Square, Montreal, Quebec H2Y 2J7. The address of Power Corporation of Canada and Power Financial Corporation is 751 Victoria Square, Montreal, Quebec H2Y 2J3. The address of Great-West Lifeco Inc. is 100 Osborne Street North, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 1V3. Robert L. Reynolds isPutnam Management also acts as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Investments. His address is 100 Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110.funds’ administrator.

Putnam Investments Limited.Putnam Investments Limited (“PIL”) is a registered investment adviser that has been retained by Putnam Management as investment sub-adviser or sub-manager with respect to a portion of the assets of certainthe funds, and is directly owned by Putnam Advisory Holdings II, LLC, which is a Delaware holding company, and is owned indirectly by Putnam Investments. The directorsan indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam Investments Limited, listed along with their principal business occupations at Putnam Investments, are Vivek Gandhi, Portfolio Manager, and Alan G. McCormack, Head of Quantitative Equities and Risk.Franklin Resources, Inc. The address of Putnam Investments Limited, Vivek Gandhi, and Alan G. McCormackPIL is 16 St. James’s Street, London, SW1A 1ER, U.K.

The address of Putnam Advisory Holdings II, LLC is 100 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110.funds do not have a distributor or principal underwriter.

Limitation of Trustee liability. Your fund’s Declaration of Trust provides that the fund will indemnify its Trustees and officers against liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with litigation in which they may be involved because of their offices with the fund, except if it is determined in the manner specified in the Declaration of Trust that they have not acted in good faith, have not acted in the reasonable belief that their actions were in the best interests of the fund or at least were not opposed to the best interests of the fund, or had reasonable cause to believe their actions were unlawful in the case of a criminal proceeding, or that such indemnification would relieve any officer or Trustee of any liability to the fund or its shareholders arising by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of his or her duties. Your fund, at its expense, provides liability insurance for the benefit of its Trustees and officers.

Auditor. The Trustees have selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 101 Seaport Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02210 as the auditor for each fund’s current fiscal year. The firm was selected primarily on the basis of its expertise as an auditor of investment companies, the quality of its audit services and the competitiveness of its fees. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be available or present at the annual meeting and to have the opportunity to make a statement and respond to appropriate questions.

On March 20, 2020, the Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee of the Trustees approved and recommended the decision to change the independent accountant of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust and Putnam Premier Income Trust and to not retain KPMG LLP, and on April 3, 2020, upon request of the Putnam Funds, KPMG LLP provided a letter of resignation. During the two previous fiscal years, KPMG LLP audit reports contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion; nor were its reports qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle. Further, in connection with its audits for the two previous fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through April 3, 2020: (i) there were no disagreements with KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in its report on the Fund’s financial statements for such years, and (ii) there were no “reportable events” of the kind described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

On April 17, 2020, the Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee of the Trustees approved and recommended the decision to appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent accountant of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust and Putnam Premier Income Trust.

The following table presents fees billed to each indicated fund in each of its last two fiscal years by the fund’s auditor:

Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust

Fiscal Year Ended	Audit Fees	Audit-Related Fees	Tax Fees	All Other Fees
October 31, 2021	$69,025	$0	$8,485	$0
October 31, 2020	$69,288	$0	$8,684	$0

Fiscal Year Ended	Audit Fees	Audit-Related Fees	Tax Fees	All Other Fees
October 31, 2023	$76,739	$0	$9,166	$0
October 31, 2022	$73,329	$0	$9,108	$0

 

Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust

Fiscal Year Ended	Audit Fees	Audit-Related Fees	Tax Fees	All Other Fees
September 30, 2021	$140,833	$0	$12,677	$0
September 30, 2020	$121,982	$0	$12,678	$0

Fiscal Year Ended	Audit Fees	Audit-Related Fees	Tax Fees	All Other Fees
September 30, 2023	$177,492	$0	$15,196	$0
September 30, 2022	$153,300	$0	$13,297	$0

 

3140

Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust

Fiscal Year Ended	Audit Fees	Audit-Related Fees	Tax Fees	All Other Fees
April 30, 2021	$68,491	$0	$8,886	$0
April 30, 2020	$78,933	$0	$12,294	$0

Fiscal Year Ended	Audit Fees	Audit-Related Fees	Tax Fees	All Other Fees
April 30, 2023	$67,321	$0	$9,987	$0
April 30, 2022	$65,322	$0	$9,094	$0

 

Putnam Premier Income Trust

Fiscal Year Ended	Audit Fees	Audit-Related Fees	Tax Fees	All Other Fees
July 31, 2021	$157,426	$0	$13,219	$0
July 31, 2020	$144,139	$0	$13,561	$0

Fiscal Year Ended	Audit Fees	Audit-Related Fees	Tax Fees	All Other Fees
July 31, 2023	$194,526	$0	$14,281	$0
July 31, 2022	$156,465	$0	$13,865	$0

 

Audit Fees represent fees billed for a fund’s last two fiscal years relating to the audit and review of the financial statements included in annual reports and registration statements, and other services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

 

Audit-Related Fees represent fees billed in a fund’s last two fiscal years for services traditionally performed by the fund’s auditor, including accounting consultation for proposed transactions or concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and other audit or attest services not required by statute or regulation.

Tax Fees represent fees billed in a fund’s last two fiscal years for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice services. Tax planning and tax advice services include assistance with tax audits, employee benefit plans and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.

The following tables present the amounts the fund’s auditor billed for aggregate non-audit fees to each fund, Putnam Management, and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Putnam Management that provides ongoing services to the fund in each of the fund’s last two fiscal years:

Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust	Oct. 31, 2021: $273,3842023: $229,798	Oct. 31, 2020: $354,5262022: $307,391
Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust	April 30, 2021: $318,3962023: $251,998	April 30, 2020: $296,0102022: $338,045
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust	Sept. 30, 2021: $277,5762023: $235,828	Sept. 30, 2020: $358,5202022: $311,580
Putnam Premier Income Trust	July 31, 2021: $322,519  2023: $256,024	July 31, 2020: $359,4032022: $342,816

 

Pre-Approval Policies of the Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee. The Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee has determined that, as a matter of policy, all work performed for the funds by the funds’ auditors will be pre-approved by the Committee itself and thus will generally not be subject to pre-approval procedures.

 

The Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee also has adopted a policy to pre-approve the engagement by Putnam Management and itscertain affiliated companies of the funds’ auditors, even in circumstances where pre-approval is not required by applicable law. Any such requests by Putnam Management or its affiliates are typically submitted in writing to the Committee and explain, among other things, the nature of the proposed engagement, the estimated fees, and why the work should be performed by that

32

particular audit firm as opposed to another one. In reviewing these requests, the Committee considers, among other things, whether the provision of such services by the audit firm is compatible with the independence of the audit firm.

41

Since the beginning of the two most recently completed fiscal years of each fund, all work performed by the auditors for the funds, Putnam Management and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Putnam Management that provides ongoing services to the funds was approved in advance by the Committee or a member of the Committee pursuant to the pre-approval policies discussed above.

The following table presents fees billed to each indicated fund in each of its last two fiscal years by the fund’s auditor for services required to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X:

Putnam Managed MunicipalIncome Trust	Fiscal year ended 2021: $264,8992023: $226,632	Fiscal year ended 2020: $283,716
		2022: $298,283
Putnam MunicipalOpportunities Trust	Fiscal year ended 2021: $309,3002023: $242,011	Fiscal year ended 2020: $283,716
		2022: $328,951
Putnam Master IntermediateIncome Trust	Fiscal year ended 2021: $264,8992023: $220,632	Fiscal year ended 2020: $345,482
		2022: $298,283
Putnam Premier Income Trust	Fiscal year ended 2021: $309,3002023: $241,743	Fiscal year ended 2020: $345,8422022: $328,951

 

The Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee of the funds has submitted the following report:

The Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee has reviewed and discussed with management of the funds the audited financial statements of each fund for the last fiscal year. The Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee has discussed with each fund’s independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by Statements on Auditing Standard No. 61 (SAS No. 61), as amended, supplemented or superseded from time to time. The Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from each fund’s independent auditor required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent auditor its independence. Based on the foregoing review and discussions, the Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee recommended to the Trustees that each fund’s audited financial statements for the last fiscal year be included in each fund’s annual report to shareholders.

Manoj P. Singh (Chairperson)
Ravi Akhoury
Katinka Domotorffy
Catharine Bond Hill
Jennifer Williams Murphy

Marie Pillai

Section 16(a) Reports. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Section 30(h) of the 1940 Act, and the rules thereunder, require each fund’s officers and Trustees, officers and directors of the investment adviser, affiliated persons of the investment adviser, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of a fund’s shares, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Based solely on a review of the reports filed with the SEC and upon representations that no additional Section 16(a) forms were required to be filed, each of Putnam Premier Income Trust, Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, and Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust believes that (during its most recently completed fiscal year), and Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust believes that (during its current fiscal year), all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to each fund’s officers, Trustees and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with.

3342

Catharine Bond Hill
Paul L. Joskow

Officers and other information. All of the officers of your fund are employees of Putnam Management or its affiliates or serve on the staff of the Office of the Trustees. Because of his positions with Putnam Management or its affiliates, Mr. Reynolds, as well as the other affiliated officers of your fund, will benefit indirectly from the management fees and investor servicing fees paid or allowed by your fund. In addition to Mr. Reynolds, the other officers of your fund are as follows:

	Length of Service
Name, Address1, Year of Birth,	with the	Principal Occupation(s)
Position(s) Held with Fund	Length of Service with the Putnam fundsFunds2	Putnam funds2	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years and Position(s) with Fund’s Investment Adviser and Distributor3
Jonathan S. Horwitz4 (Born 1955) Executive Vice President, Principal Executive Officer, and Compliance Liaison	Since 2004	Executive Vice President, Principal
Executive Vice President,		Executive Officer, and Compliance
Principal Executive Officer and		Liaison, The Putnam FundsFunds.
Compliance Liaison
Stephen J. Tate (Born(Born 1974)	Since 2021	General Counsel, Putnam Investments,
Vice President and Chief Legal Officer	Since 2021	Deputy General Counsel, Franklin Templeton and Secretary, Putnam U.S. Holdings I, LLC (“Putnam Holdings”), Putnam Management and Putnam Retail
		Management (2021(2024 – Present).
		Deputy General Counsel
		and related positions, Putnam Investments,
		Putnam Management and Putnam
		Retail Management (2004-2021)(2004-2023).
James F. Clark3(Born (Born 1974) Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer	Since 2016	Chief Compliance Officer, Putnam Holdings and ChiefPutnam Management (2016 – Present). Associate General Counsel, Putnam Investments, Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management (2003-2015).
Vice President and		Risk Officer, Putnam Investments
Chief Compliance Officer		and Chief Compliance Officer,
		Putnam Management
Michael J. Higgins4 (Born 1976) Vice President, Treasurer, and Clerk	Since 2010	Vice President, Treasurer, and Clerk, The Putnam Funds.
Vice President, Treasurer, and Clerk		Putnam Funds
Richard T. Kircher Kevin R. Blatchford (Born 1962)	Since 2019	Assistant Director of Operational
1967) Vice President and BSAAssistant Treasurer	Since 2024	Compliance,Director, Financial Reporting, Putnam Investments andHoldings
Kelley Hunt (Born 1984) AML Compliance Officer	Since 2024	Putnam Retail ManagementManager, U.S. Financial Crime Compliance, Franklin Templeton
Janet C. Smith (Born(Born 1965) Vice President, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, and Assistant Treasurer	Since 2007	Head of Fund Administration Services, Putnam Holdings and Putnam Management.
Vice President, Principal Financial Officer,		Putnam Investments and Putnam
Principal Accounting Officer and		Management
Assistant Treasurer
SusanAlan G. MalloyMcCormack5 (Born 1957)	Since 2007	Head of Accounting, Middle Office and
1964) Vice President and Assistant Treasurer		Control Services, Putnam Investments
		and Putnam Management
Mark C. Trenchard (Born 1962)	Since 2002	Director of Operational Compliance,
Vice President		Putnam Investments and Putnam Retail
Alan G. McCormack (Born 1964)Derivatives Risk Manager	Since 2022	Head of Quantitative Equities and Risk, Putnam Management.
Martin Lemaire5 (Born 1984) Vice President and Derivatives Risk Manager		Putnam Investments.

34

	Length of Service
Name, Address1, Year of Birth,	with the	Principal Occupation(s)
Position(s) Held with Putnam funds	Putnam funds2	During Past 5 Years3
Martin Lemaire (Born 1984)	Since 2022	Risk Manager, Putnam Investments
Vice President and Derivatives Risk Manager		Management (2020 – Present).
		Risk Analyst, Putnam Investments
		Management (2016 – 2020).
Nancy E. Florek4 (Born 1957)	Since 2000	Vice President, Director of Proxy Voting
Vice President, Director of Proxy Voting		and Corporate Governance, Assistant
and Corporate Governance, Assistant		Clerk and Associate Treasurer, The
Clerk, and Associate Treasurer		Putnam Funds
Denere P. Poulack4 (Born(Born 1968) Assistant Vice President, Assistant Clerk, and Assistant Treasurer	Since 2004	Assistant Vice President, Assistant Clerk,
Assistant Vice President, Assistant Clerk,		and Assistant Treasurer, The Putnam
and Assistant Treasurer		Funds
		Funds.

 

1 The address of each officer, other than Ms. Hunt, is 100 Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110. Ms. Hunt’s address is 100 Fountain Parkway, St. Petersburg, FL 33716.

 

2 Each officer serves an indefinite term, until his or her resignation, retirement, death, or removal.

3 Prior positions and/or officer appointments with the fund or the fund’s investment adviser have been omitted.

4 Officers of the fund who are members of the Trustees’ independent administrative staff. Compensation for these individuals is fixed by the Trustees and reimbursed to Putnam Management by the funds.

Net assets of your fund as of December 31, 20212023

Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust	$404,571,012.24*313,216,325.08*
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust	$199.502,612167,522,858.08
Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust	$471,138,069.11*371,520,740.14*
Putnam Premier Income Trust	$444,455,124.15371,492,463.09

 

* Excludes the amount of aggregate liquidation preference of outstanding preferred shares of the fund.

43

Shares outstanding of your fund as of February 15, 202214, 2024

	Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust	Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust	Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust	Putnam Premier Income Trust	Putnam Managed  Municipal Income  Trust	Putnam Master  Intermediate  Income Trust	Putnam Municipal  Opportunities Trust	Putnam Premier  Income Trust
Common	48,972,639.17	51,239,884.69	34,139,288.22	102,233,010.78	46,431,063.519	48,338,471.693	31,811,052.648	96,268,784.775
Series A Preferred	240	—			240	—
Series B Preferred	—		2,876	—	—		2,876	—
Series C Preferred	1,507	—	2,673	—	1,507	—	2,673	—

 

3544

 

5% Beneficial Ownership. As of February 28, 2022,29, 2024, to the knowledge of the funds, no person owned beneficially or of record 5% or more of any class of shares of any fund, except as noted as follows:

				Percentage
Fund Shareholder Name and Address	Holdings	Percentage Owned	Holdings	Owned
Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust
CEDE & Company*
20 Bowling Green
New York, NY 10004-1408	46,719,528	95.58%	44,717,179.000	96.36%
First Trust Portfolios L.P.#
First Trust Advisors L.P.
The Charger Corporation
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400	3,874,662
Wheaton, Illinois 60187	common shares	7.93%
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust
CEDE & Company*
20 Bowling Green
New York, NY 10004-1408	48,782,908	95.47%	46,139,731.000	95.45%
Sit Investment Associates, Inc.**
Sit Investment Associates, Inc.** Sit Fixed Income Advisors II, LLC
3300 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402	14,223,479	27.79%	20,596,978	42.42%
First Trust Portfolios L.P.#
First Trust Advisors L.P.
The Charger Corporation
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400
Wheaton, Illinois 60187	8,150,015	15.93%
Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust
CEDE & Company*
20 Bowling Green
New York, NY 10004-1408	33,193,172	97.23%	30,791,507.000	97.20%
First Trust Portfolios L.P.#
First Trust Advisors L.P.
The Charger Corporation
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400	2,634,425
Wheaton, Illinois 60187	common shares	7.72%

 

36

				Percentage
Fund Shareholder Name and Address	Holdings	Percentage Owned	Holdings	Owned
Putnam Premier Income Trust
CEDE & Company*
20 Bowling Green
New York, NY 10004-1408	96,137,050	94.55%	90,748,566.000	94.27%
Sit Investment Associates, Inc.**
Sit Investment Associates, Inc.** Sit Fixed Income Advisors II, LLC
3300 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402	16,720,173	16.36%	19,792,543	20.19%
First Trust Portfolios L.P.#
First Trust Advisors L.P.
The Charger Corporation
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400
Wheaton, Illinois 60187	11,339,986	10.99%	8,565,584	8.74%

 

• Believed to hold shares only as nominee.

 

** Sit Investment Associates, Inc., and Sit Fixed Income Advisors II, LLC reported beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2021 in 13G filings with the Securities1, 2023 (with respect to Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust) and Exchange Commission. Some or all of their positions may be reflected in Cede & Company’s positions in the funds.

# First Trust Portfolios, L.P., First Trust Advisors L.P., and The Charger Corporation reported shared beneficial share ownership as of December 31, 2021January 4, 2024 (with respect to Putnam Premier Income Trust) in 13G/13D/A filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Some or all of their positions may be reflected in Cede & Company’s positions in the funds.

 

# First Trust Portfolios, L.P., First Trust Advisors L.P., and The Charger Corporation reported shared beneficial share ownership as of December 31, 2023 in a 13G/A filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Some or all of their positions may be reflected in Cede & Company’s positions in the funds.

44

Putnam Investments
100 Federal Street
Boston, MA 02110
1-800-225-1581

Address correspondence to:
Putnam Investments
P.O. Box 219697
Kansas City, MO 64121-9697

putnam.com	329179  3/22

 

3645